Zsombor Piros vs Borna Coric Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Apr at 05:06 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Z. Piros vs B. Coric

HUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-To-Head: Piros 1 - 0 Coric
They have played 3 sets in total, with Zsombor Piros winning 2 and Borna Coric winning 1. The last match between Zsombor Piros and Borna Coric was at the Madrid Challenger, 09-04-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Zsombor Piros getting the victory 5-7 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Piros | 1 |
Coric | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R2) Madrid Challenger(04-09-25)
Z. Piros vs B. Coric H2H Profile
Z. Piros vs B. Coric Match Preview
In an epic showdown on the tennis court, we've got two mighty players ready to flex their muscles in a head-to-head clash for the ages. On one side, we have the formidable Borna Coric, whose second serve performance in the last six months has been a bit like trying to eat soup with a fork, winning only 44.09% of points. Meanwhile, Zsombor Piros has been slightly more successful, capturing 44.69% of points with his trusty second serve. It's like comparing two kittens, one slightly more dexterous than the other.
When it comes to return games, Coric channels his inner ninja and slices through 43.29% of his opponent's second serve points, albeit with less gusto than Piros' 43.7%. If you look at their first serve return stats, it's like watching a friendly game of hopscotch: 22.02% for Coric compared to Piros at a whopping 28.52%. When these stats battle it out, it's clear who has the comeback power to send fans roaring with excitement.
Under pressure, Coric becomes a stoic thermostat, keeping his cool by saving 57.63% of breakpoints, while Piros, a little more frazzled, manages a respectable 51.7%. Their match performance indicates that Coric has a slight edge, winning 56.36% of matches over the past year. Meanwhile, Piros isn't far behind, creeping up with a 55.38% success rate. In rounding up their career results, Coric thrives on indoor hard courts, boasting a 61% success rate, while grass doesn’t play nice with his forehand at just 41%. Piros, the clay aficionado, has a career win rate of 66%, though he finds hard courts trickier with a 52% success rate.
Diving into the realm of tournament level and opponent quality, Coric has played diligently across the tennis chessboard, with a lion's share at Challengers/ITF tournaments, seizing victory 77.78% of the time. Piros, competing mostly among similar arenas, rates at about 60%. Facing off against opponents, Coric has jousted with higher-ranked foes, facing an average rank of 210.2, while Piros the gladiator has tackled challengers with an average rank of 279.43.
In deciding sets, both players balance on a tightrope, each emerging victorious 50% of the time, showing equal parts grace and fortitude. But, oh, when they see a breakpoint opportunity: Coric converts like a moody vending machine at 26.05%, while Piros trades in magical beans, cashing in a strong 34.08% to crush his rival's serve dreams. Based on the numbers and our crystal ball antics, the scales tip slightly in favor of Piros, standing tall as a reliable contender with a veiled nod towards a captivating victory!
Zsombor Piros vs Borna Coric Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Z. Piros vs B. Coric H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
17 | Games Won | 14 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
2:38:27 | Avg. Match Time | 2:38:27 |
59% (61/103) | 1st Serve % | 65% (64/98) |
67% (41/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (44/64) |
57% (24/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (15/34) |
36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
40% (39/98) | Return Pts Won % | 37% (38/103) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
Z. Piros Recent Matches Played
B. Coric Recent Matches Played

Z. Piros vs B. Coric Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
63.06% (309/181) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.58% (362/256) |
59.76% (686/462) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.50% (863/692) |
52.85% (5780/5157) | Games Win/Loss | 51.89% (7853/7280) |
52.81% (47/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.11% (154/111) |
66.67% (202/101) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.71% (119/77) |
61.63% (53/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.16% (77/51) |
58.33% (7/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 41.38% (12/17) |
0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.41 |
1479 | Aces Total | 3076 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
1249 | Total Double Faults | 1181 |
1:35:23 | Average Match Time | 1:40:25 |
443.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 383.32 |
60% (20513/33946) | 1st Serve % | 62% (25549/41469) |
66% (13597/20513) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (18513/25549) |
52% (6956/13433) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8376/15916) |
45% (1602/3592) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1383/3609) |
41% (13826/33559) | Return Points Win % | 37% (15328/41906) |
50.00% (13/13) | Slam W/L | 47.14% (33/37) |
33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 53.38% (79/69) |
73.33% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 61.29% (19/12) |
23.53% (4/13) | Main Tour W/L | 53.33% (112/98) |
63.23% (184/107) | Challenger W/L | 71.43% (60/24) |
69.57% (96/42) | Futures W/L | 79.73% (59/15) |
63% (299/472) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (311/520) |
17% (1/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 52% (46/88) |
56% (89/159) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (145/276) |
57% (99/173) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (117/204) |
86% (293/251) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (343/287) |
14% (293/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (343/55) |
29% (196/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (274/72) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Piros (Jingshan Challenger)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
